
On the underside of the track the most noticeable difference is the webbing between the ties. On "A" it is as wide as the base of the rail; on "C" it is about half as thick. The writing has also been reformatted a bit, but the only notable change is the revision letter. The other noticeable difference is the tie thickness has changed: on "A" each tie is 2.35mm (0.0925" = 8" scale), on "C" it is 2.20mm (0.0866" = 7.5" scale). A minor difference to be sure, but it can definitely be seen when they're side by side.

For comparison, the spikes on the classic Atlas code 100 flextrack are a massive 1.75mm (0.0689" = 6" scale) on 3.4mm (0.1339" = 11.7" scale) ties).
Has anyone else noticed this? Any idea why they did that? Of note, the finer spike detail is on the fixed rail and the coarser spike detail is on the sliding rail.
05-Dec-2010 update: I found some revision "B" track in my collection. It looks superficially similar to "A" track, I haven't bothered to pull out the calipers to see if any of the dimensions differ, but they look very close. I have attached a scan of both top and bottom for reference.
No comments:
Post a Comment